Saturday, September 27, 2008


In attempts at knowledge and understanding it must be realized that frustration and confusion are part of the game. I encountered this head on when attempting to distinguish between text and Text. Leading to even more frustration is Barthes assertion that the Text is not to be thought of as an object that can be computed. Then what the hell is it, an idea? I find that although vague, Barthes realizes that a strict dictionary definition is unsatisfactory in the deeper meaning of this abstract almost all encompassing idea of text is. Perhaps it is crucial to note that Text both is and is not simultaneously. Text is a container full of definitions. Therefore its understanding is based on fluctuating instances of piercing emotion in which the reader doesn’t necessarily comprehend the Text but instead feels it moving through them.
Barthes explains that while a work is displayed the Text is demonstrated. With this idea in mind I chose an image of text fluctuating on the page. I feel the idea of Text leaping off the page is very helpful in identifying the importance of how we interpret the Text. I felt that band one’s assertion that the Text is abstract and irreducible helped me to understand the relevance of Barthes’ argument for Text. While I was trying narrowly define the notion of Text, band one articulated how the Text was not important as a strict definition but instead as a collaborative effort find the true meaning of our unconscious understanding of media.
We also discussed memory work and its significance in understanding our own repressed memories and ideas. Memory work is an effective way to tap into, not only are subconscious but to a certain extent the Barthes’ idea of Text. Because memory work focuses on pinpointing this piercing it can also help us to find Text and that which it encompasses. While we are focusing on the unconscious mind and its interpretations, it is important to note that all are efforts are strictly conscious and cognizant. That said I argue that we can never truly these abstract concepts. However it is yet to be realized whether these attempts at knowledge will lead to a better society or are just futile efforts to define the indefinable.

1 comment:

Kate, Barry, Arlo, and Ezra said...

You wrote: "That said I argue that we can never truly these abstract concepts. However it is yet to be realized whether these attempts at knowledge will lead to a better society or are just futile efforts to define the indefinable."

Ohh...I wish I knew what the missing word was in the 1st sentence--know? understand? relate? be? etc. Regardless, you're onto the hardest part about all of this Barthes...the who cares, what's the point, why bother aspect of it all. Are we just engaging in a futile exercise that we'll completely forget once this class is over? Is something more happening? What is the value of pure thought w/out concrete action? Tough stuff.